Legal Opinion
Miller v. District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 27, 1964No. 21094PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
This is an original proceeding in mandamus in which the prayer of the petition was:
“That an order be issued directing the Respondent District Court in and for the County of Arapahoe, to show cause why it should not be ordered and directed to vacate and set aside its order entered in Civil Action No. 17684, which order granted plaintiffs Motion to Strike from the Jury Calendar and Restore to the Calendar as a Trial to the Court.”
Upon consideration of the petition we directed that the rule to show cause should issue. From the showing-made by the instruments filed herein it appears that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. NeelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Cree v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Danielson v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Neikirk v. Boulder National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- United Coal Co. v. Canon City Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Miller v. Carnation CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- First National Bank of Meeker v. TheosColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.