Legal Opinion

Canister Co. v. Leahy, Chief Judge

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 17, 1950No. 10077PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, phief Judge.

On May 13, 1943 the Canister Company and on February 1, 1944 The Canister Company, Inc. (referred to collectively hereinafter as “Canister”) filed suits in the court below (Civil Actions Nos. 309 and 365) against National Can Corporation (“National Can”-). The complaints in the two suits may be treated as substantially identical for the purposes of the instant suit. Both complaints sought specific performance of an oral contract entered into-by Canister and National Can on February 17, 1943 and damages for its breach. National Can filed answers and asserted by way of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bereslavsky v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Bereslavsky v. KloebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Canister Co. v. National Can CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  5. Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Laskaris v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Canister Co. v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Setchell v. DellacroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Reuben Klein and Elaine D. Klein v. Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API