Legal Opinion

Neikirk v. Boulder National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 6897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Brror to Boulder District Court. — Hon. James E. GarriguES, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

In 1901, the plaintiffs in error, Henry and Emily Neikirk, were indebted to The Boulder National Bank on three promissory notes, which were secured by trust deeds upon" real estate owned by the Neikirks. All of the real estate, except one lot, was released from the trust deeds, and, with *351other property, conveyed to Switzer by quit claim deed absolute on its face. The court found, from ample supporting evidence, that the conveyance to Switzer was made to secure the notes then held by the bank, and future advances that might be made to the Nleikirks, or either of them. The form of the bank’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ClaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Goodrich v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Danielson v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Hall v. LinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Denver Brick & Manuf'g Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. First National Bank of Meeker v. TheosColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Setchell v. DellacroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API