Legal Opinion
Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 7, 1982No. 82SA82PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21 the petitioners seek reversal of an order of the District Court in and for the City and County of Denver granting the motion of Central Bank and Trust Company (Central Bank) to strike petitioners’ request for a jury trial and claim for exemplary damages because the action was equitable in nature. We issued a rule to show cause and now, having determined that the trial court was correct, discharge the rule.
The petitioners were beneficiaries of guardianship estates created by the Denver Probate Court. Central Bank was appointed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. KaiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Setchell v. DellacroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Federal Lumber Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Glenn Hill v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.