Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 6, 1976No. 7618SC359PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the following instructions given by the trial court to the jury:
“If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant Hall assaulted Oliver Jamieson with intent to kill, that assault would be excused as being in self-defense only if the circumstances at the time he acted were such as would create in the mind of a person of ordinary firmness a reasonable belief that such action was necessary to protect himself from death or great bodily harm, and the circumstances did create such belief in the defendant’s mind. It is for you, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- S. v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StarksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981