Legal Opinion

State v. Tann

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1982No. 814SC980PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant by his first assignment contends that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury regarding what circumstances should be considered in determining the reasonableness of defendant’s apprehension of death or great bodily harm.

The reasonableness of the apprehension must be determined by the jury on the basis of all facts and circumstances as they appeared to defendant at the time of the shooting. State v. Ellerbe, 223 N.C. 770, 28 S.E. 2d 519 (1944).

Among the circumstances to be considered by the jury are the size, age and strength of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. State v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. . FriddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. TemplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API