Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 115PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

In his supplemental brief, defendant addresses himself primarily to the trial court’s charge as it related to self-defense.

After charging the jury correctly as to the grounds of self-defense, Judge Winner gave the following instruction:

“Now, members of the jury, under the law of this State a person may not normally avail himself of self-defense when he has used deadly force to quell an assault or attack by someone who does not have a deadly weapon.
“However, if you are satisfied that because of the number of attackers or their size or the fierceness of the attack or all three…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. WaldenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. W.J.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API