Legal Opinion · Concurrence

S. v. . Blackwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1913PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1ConcurrenceHoke, J.

The plea in this case was self-defense. The prisoner offered evidence to show that the deceased was a violent and dangerous man when under the influence of liquor, and there was evidence tending to show that he had been drinking (680) just before he was cut with the knife by the prisoner. For the purpose of testing the competency of the proposed evidence, we will, therefore, assume that the was under the influence of liquor at the time he assaulted the prisoner with the stick. There was no offer to show that the prisoner, at the time of the alteration, knew of the alleged character of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Danville Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gallivan Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API