Legal Opinion

State v. Dooley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 57PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant brings forward fourteen assignments of error designated as Exceptions Nos. I to XIV. We first consider Exception No. XIV, which defendant states in his brief as follows:

“The defendant objects and excepts in the record to the failure of the court to charge the jury in his mandates to the jury the following proposition: ‘Or, if you are satisfied that the defendant acted in self-defense, then it will be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.’ ”

G.S. 1-180 requires that the trial judge fully instruct the jury as to the law based on the evidence in the case. It is the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BrockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API