State v. Powell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
By his sole argument on appeal defendant contends the trial court erred in its instructions on self-defense. He argues that the court should have instructed the jury to consider, in determining the reasonableness of defendant’s apprehension of death or great bodily harm, among other factors, the reputation of McKethan for danger and violence.
In prosecutions for homicide and assault, where the defendant pleads and offers evidence of self-defense, evidence of the character of the victim as a violent and dangerous fighting man is admissible if such character was known to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . RiddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. MizeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982