Riverside County v. Stockman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. W. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Action to condemn lands for purposes of a highway, under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to eminent domain. Ten defendants are named in the complaint; among them P. J. Stockman and another, who are alleged to be executors of the estate of one Mathew Byrne, deceased. Service of summons and copy of complaint was made on both of said executors in December, 1895. Afterward, plaintiff filed amendments to its complaint—the first on February 24, 1896, and a second on March 12, 1896; it may be conceded that both these amendments were of matter of substance. Said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linott v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Livermore v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Thompson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Segerstrom v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Gaddis v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.