Segerstrom v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment on the judgment-roll alone.
The action was -instituted, under section 3495 of the Political Code, for the purpose of determining the conflicting claims of the parties to the right to purchase from the state the lands described in the pleadings.
It appears from the complaint that on the twenty-fifth day of November, 1908, the “defendant filed with the surveyor-general of the state of California her application, numbered 3501, Sacramento Land District, to purchase of said state, under the provisions of sections 3494 and 3495 of the Political Code, the land”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Eichhoff v. EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Rodriguez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Gaddis v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Erving v. Napa Valley Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.