Legal Opinion

Livermore v. Webb

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,141PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal by defendants Greene and Jackson from a judgment in favor of defendant Webb, in the Sixteenth District Court, County of Kern. Reed, J„ A petition for a rehearing in Bank was filed by appellants after the decision, and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

The appeal is by defendants Greene and Jackson from a judgment adjudging and decreeing that defendant C. C. Webb is the sole owner in fee of all the lands described in the complaint, and that neither the plaintiffs nor any of the other defendants have any estate, right, title, or interest in the lands, or any portion of them.

Respondent asks that the cause be stricken from our calendar, because, as he claims, no appeal has properly been taken. The judgment roll shows that Samuel L. Cutter, Esq., had appeared as attorney for defendants Greene and Jackson in .the Court below. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prescott v. SalthouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hancock v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Alliance Bank v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API