Legal Opinion

Grimbley v. Harrold

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1899No. Sac. No. 541PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San. Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

There was evidence at the trial of this action that in the summer of the year 1894 the plaintiff, a young woman, upon the request and at the expense of one Frederick Shelton, her uncle, left her home in England and came to this state, where said Shelton resided, for the purpose of caring for him in sickness; he proposing in rather indefinite terms to make some provision for her, saying, among other things, that he had some papers he wanted her to have. Shelton was then and had been for several years previously a member of the society called the Ancient Order of United Workmen, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. National Benefit SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hoeft v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Daniher v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Robinson v. Templar Lodge, No. 17California Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API