Robinson v. Templar Lodge, No. 17
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Appeal from the judgment. The action was brought to recover eight hundred dollars for sick benefits. The complaint charges that defendant, by a contract in writing, agreed to pay plaintiff four dollars per week in case he became incapable of earning a livelihood through sickness; that he was so incapacitated during the month of April, 1889, and has so remained ever since; that no part of the said sum of four dollars per week has been paid.
*372Defendant, in its answer, denies the contract, and also that plaintiff was sick or incapacitated to earn a. livelihood. Defendant also avers, in effect,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Levy v. Magnolia Lodge, No. 29, I. O. O. F.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Van Poucke v. Netherland St. Vincent De Paul SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Canfield v. Great Camp of the Knights of the MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. Templar Lodge No. 17California Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Grimbley v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.