Legal Opinion

Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. Behrend

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1918No. 267PublishedCited by 68 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP' THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

The Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum is incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts as a fraternal benefit society, and it is licensed as a fraternal beneficial association in the District of Columbia. 1 The character and purposes of the organization and the relation to its members are described in Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. Green, 237 U. S. 531. Samuel K. Behrend became a member of a local lodge of the order in Washington, known as “Oriental Council, No. 312,. Royal-Arcanum.” • On March 1, 1899, a $3,000 “Benefit Certificate” was issued to him there, payable on his death to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Masonic Benevolent Ass'n v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Marsh v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Kochanek v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API