Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Barnhill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The trial was had on the common counts, and count 7, added by way of amendment. It is averred in the latter count that plaintiff was a member of defendant order, and that defendant contracted with plaintiff at the time he became a member, as such employee of said railway company “and as a striking member of said brotherhood to pay plaintiff strike benefits or strike pay” at the rate indicated, being, after the first year, “.$100 per month” “so long as said strike should-last;” that all strike benefits due plaintiff from March 5, 1921, until September 5, 1923, were paid. It is further averred…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Rose v. MagroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Kopke v. RanneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Madison County. Board of Education v. WigleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.