Legal Opinion

Long v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1947No. 32763PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Henry Long, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment in favor of the city of Tulsa denying to plaintiff recovery of damages and equitable *218relief alleged to have resulted from the construction of a lateral sanitary sewer along the length of plaintiff’s lot.

Plaintiff’s property is described as lot 7, block 1, Sunrise Terrace Third addition to the city of Tulsa. Plaintiff acquired the lot by purchase in the year 1945.

Theretofore, in the year 1928, as a part of a sewer district regularly created by city ordinance, the sewer was laid beneath the surface the entire length and breadth of the lot. A…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drake v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Drake v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. City of Mangum v. Sun Set FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Galt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Cox Enterprises, Ltd. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Drabek v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Busby v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Edwards v. BancFIRSTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API