Legal Opinion

Drake v. Howell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ActioN by J. C. Drake and others against S. D. Howell and others, heard by Judge Frederick Moore and a jury at September Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Heetpobd County. From a judgment for the plaintiffs the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWaleee, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for cutting and removing timber from a tract of land known as the Britt place. The land belonged to H. B. Parker, Sr., who, in 1899, conveyed it to his sons, H. B. Parker, Jr., and Fred. P. Parker. The plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased the standing timber on the land from H. B. Parker, Sr., “by a verbal contract.” They introduced in evidence an agreement, in form of a deed, dated September 13, 1897, by which tire trees on the Britt place were conveyed by the plaintiff J. C. Drake to S. D. Howell & Co., of which firm the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Mizell v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  4. Cox v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Staton v. . MullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Fordham v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Adams v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Ives v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API