Legal Opinion

Drake v. . Howell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for cutting and removing timber for a tract of land known as the Britt place. The land belonged to H. B. Parker, Sr., who in 1899, conveyed it to his sons, H. B. Parker, Jr., and Fred P. Parker. The plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased the standing timber on the land from H. B. Parker, Sr., "by a verbal contract." They introduced in evidence an agreement, in form of a deed, dated 13 September, 1897, by which the trees on the Britt place were conveyed by the plaintiff J. C. Drake to S.D. Howell Co., of which firm the defendant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Mizell v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  4. Ives v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Cox v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Fordham v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Adams v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Winston v. Williams & McKeithan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Chandler v. . CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API