Legal Opinion

Dayoub v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1982 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Uhlan Dayoub, D.D.S. (petitioner) appeals here an order of the State Dental Council and Examining *622Board (Board) revoking Ms license to practice dentistry. He had been charged with writing prescriptions without a legitimate medical purpose in violation of Section 3(i) of the Dental Law (Law), Act of May 1, 1933, P.L. 216, as amended, 63 P.S. §122 (i).

The Board found that the petitioner, a practitioner of 27 years, has operated a one-chair dental office in New Kensington, a community where he has also been the local school dentist for approximately 25 years. Pie was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Schlesinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. Thorp, Reed & ArmstrongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re the Suspension or Revocation of the License to Practice as a DentistCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Oppenheim v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Makris v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Infinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Greenstein v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API