Legal Opinion

Oppenheim v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1983No. Appeal, No. 3080 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Dentists Kenneth R. Oppenheim and Steven M. Sloane appeal from orders of the State Dental Council and Examining Board which suspended their licenses for ninety, days. We affirm.

Jean Gladfelter Prescott, a registered dental hygienist and former part-time employee of Drs. Oppenheim and Sloane, initiated the complaint process against both dentists in May of 1979, informing Nancy Miller, then a registered dental hygienist active in local, state and national hygienist associations and now a member of the board, that Drs. Oppenheim and Sloane were permitting dental assistants,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Foose v. BD. OF VEHICLE MFRS.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Makris v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API