Makris v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
James Makris (Makris) appeals from an adjudication and order of the State Board of Psychology (Board) entered November 20, 1990, which found that he had committed two violations of the Professional Psychologists Practice Act (Act). 1 We affirm.
It is undisputed that from 1984 to 1990 Makris and his wife operated the Good Neighbor Center (Center) as a massage therapy center. At a hearing before the Board, Mrs. Paula B. (Mrs. B.) testified that she went to the Center to receive massage therapy for the treatment of migraine headaches in November, 1988. Notes of Testimony, June 12,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Kundrat v. Commonwealth, State Dental Council & Examining BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Schneck v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rabinowitz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barran v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Rost v. State Board of PsychologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Singer v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Batoff v. State Board of PsychologySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pennsylvania Game Commission v. K.D. Miller Lumber Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.