Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
John and Jane Doe appeal from the district court’s affirmance of the magistrate court’s order terminating their parental rights based on findings that the Does neglected their two children and that termination served the best interests of the children. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case involves two children, the Does’ son and daughter, with divergent problems and needs. The son is the elder, having been born on December 16,1997. He has difficulties with speech and suffers from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Reactive Attachment Disorder. He was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Swanson v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Crum v. State Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Hofmeister v. BauerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Interest of Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Termination of the Parental Rights of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.