Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2011No. Nos. 38534, 38536, 38567PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Jane Doe and John Doe appeal the trial court’s February 3, 2011 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (hereinafter “Feb. 3, 2011 Order”) terminating Jane Doe’s parental rights to her four children (T.S., S.S., A.H. and S.H.) and John Doe’s parental rights to his two children (T.S. and S.S.) on the grounds of neglect and the best interest of the children. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

S.S. and T.S. were born to Jane Doe and John Doe in 2003 and 2006 respectively. Jane Doe and John Doe lived together for a total of approximately eleven months.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. LIPONIS v. BachIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Jane Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API