Legal Opinion

Roe v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2005No. 31356PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

John Doe (Doe) appeals from a magistrate court decision terminating his parental rights to his minor child, Baby Doe, which was affirmed on appeal to the district court. We hold that there is substantial and competent evidence to affirm the magistrate’s decision to terminate Doe’s parental rights on the grounds of neglect.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Doe is the father of Baby Doe and son of the Respondents, John Roe and Jane Roe (the Roes), Baby Doe’s grandparents. Soon after Baby Doe was born out-of-wedlock, his mother left the area and has not been in contact since.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Opportunity, L.L.C. v. OssewardeIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Jane Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API