Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2009No. 35784PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

John Doe II appeals from the district court order affirming the magistrate court’s order terminating his parental rights as to his two children, T.W. and Q.W. Doe II alleges that the magistrate’s finding, that the termination of Doe II’s parental rights was in the best interest of his children, was not supported by substantial and competent evidence. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

John Doe II is the father of two children, T.W. and Q.W. (the children) born on November 14, 2000, and February 19, 2003, respectively. On February 16, 2007, Jane Doe and John Doe I…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jane Doe (2015-03) v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API