Legal Opinion

In re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2014No. 41688PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON THE BRIEFS

HORTON, Justice.

This is an expedited appeal from the magistrate court’s order terminating the parental rights of John Doe (2013-29) based upon the trial court’s finding that that Doe neglected his minor child, T.C., and that it was in T.C.’s best interests to terminate Doe’s parental rights. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Doe is the biological father of T.C. who was born in October of 2010. Doe was a juvenile when T.C. was born. T.C. has Type I diabetes and requires specialized medical care. Doe and T.C.’s mother (Mother) were never married and never resided…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Interest of Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Kara Alexander v. Vianna StibalIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API