Legal Opinion

Brock v. Button

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1936No. 25977. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action by Margaret J. Brock against C. A. Button for damages for breach of a marriage contract. The cause was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on several grounds, one of them being:

“That from all the evidence adduced upon the trial of the cause it appears that the agreement of plaintiff and defendant to marry each other was not by its terms to have been performed within one year from the date when said agreement was made, and that said agreement to marry was not in writing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nichols v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Tracy v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Barge v. HaslamNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re the Marriage of DewBerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Sessions v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
  5. Gronvold v. WhaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API