Union Savings & Trust Co. v. Krumm
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King •county, Mackintosh, J., entered June 3, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action to recover an overdraft.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover an overdraft of the defendant at its Renton branch, amounting, as alleged, to $4,931.12. The answer of the defendant consisted of denials, five affirmative defenses, and four counterclaims. The first affirmative defense set up a credit of $4,300. This the jury allowed by a special verdict, finding the defendant indebted to the plaintiff on the overdraft in the sum of $631.12. It is admitted that this finding was fully supported by the evidence, no error being assigned upon it.
In the second affirmative defense and first counterclaim, it was alleged…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Chase v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Tootle v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Greaves v. Medical Imaging System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Boatmen's BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Cone v. ArissWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Cascade Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.