Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 15, 1943No. 2933-HPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLZER, District Judge.

This is a suit for damages founded upon alleged anticipatory breaches of two contracts. The matters requiring determination arise out of certain motions, interposed separately by each of the defendants, attacking the sufficiency of the complaint.

The complaint consists of four counts. While two defendants have been joined, one named Lennen & Mitchell, Inc., a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as Lennen, and the other the Andrew Jergens Company, an Ohio corporation, hereinafter referred to as Jergens, only the acts of the former are complained of in the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. W. M. W. N.W. Ry. Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. ButzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  2. Bank of Utah, a Utah Corporation, and Bank of Ben Lomond, a Utah Corporation v. Commercial Security Bank, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Alpha Distributing Co. of California, Inc. v. Jack Daniel's Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1961
  4. Gerard v. MercerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1945
  5. United States v. Carolina Warehouse Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API