Legal Opinion

Gronvold v. Whaley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1951No. 31706PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for specific performance of an oral joint venture contract entered into in 1935 with defendants R. S. Whaley and H. A. Dent. Plaintiff prayed for a decree directing Whaley and Dent to deliver certain stock to him, or, in the alternative, for a decree imposing a constructive trust on the stock so that his interest would be protected. Defendants’ answer, in addition to denials of the principal allegations of the complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses, the statute of frauds and the statute of limitations being the only ones pertinent to the questions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Peabody v. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Campbell v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greaves v. Medical Imaging System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bell v. HegewaldWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lectus, Inc. v. Rainier National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API