Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 4, 1985No. 2 CA-SA 162PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This special action was taken from the order of the trial court denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss based on the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. Because we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion, and because petitioner has no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by way of appeal, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief in part. The following facts are pertinent to our disposition.
On or about June 20, 1975, petitioner and his then wife Alma Bailey executed a promissory note in the principal amount of $4,000…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. CopusTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Snoddy v. CageTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. HilvertArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Engle Bros. v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Mourning v. Crown Stevedoring CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Monroe v. WoodArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Arimilli v. RezendesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Derwin Sims, Sr. v. John HauserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Martin v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.