Legal Opinion

State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. Copus

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1958No. A-6363PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

The State of California, petitioner, sued respondent, Dale W. Copus, now domiciled in Texas, for money expended by the State in the care, support and maintenance of. his mother, an incompetent inmate of a state institution. A judgment for the full .amount sued for was reversed and rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals. 301 S.W. 2d 217. We concur in the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that no recovery can be had for support furnished after respondent removed to and became domiciled *198in this state. But we disagree with the conclusion that the Texas two-year statute of limitation would…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Rosenzweig v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Franco v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. America Online, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Ellis v. Great Southwestern Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Goad v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API