Engle Bros. v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Should the respondent court have granted petitioner’s motion to dismiss a complaint against it? That is the sole question presented in this special action proceeding. Since denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory, nonappealable order, appellate intervention via special action is appropriate. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court, 5 Ariz.App. 100, 423 P.2d 375 (1967).
The following is a brief summary of what transpired below prior to the challenged ruling. Respondent real parties in interest filed a complaint against petitioner in September 1973, seeking to recover damages…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Selby v. KarmanArizona Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Bob Rivera, and Eduardo Rivera v. Al Green, Karen Green, Mitchell Simmons, Carl W. Johnson and Maricopa County Sheriff's Dept.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Hun v. Center PropertiesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.