Legal Opinion

Engle Bros. v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1831PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Should the respondent court have granted petitioner’s motion to dismiss a complaint against it? That is the sole question presented in this special action proceeding. Since denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory, nonappealable order, appellate intervention via special action is appropriate. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court, 5 Ariz.App. 100, 423 P.2d 375 (1967).

The following is a brief summary of what transpired below prior to the challenged ruling. Respondent real parties in interest filed a complaint against petitioner in September 1973, seeking to recover damages…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Selby v. KarmanArizona Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bob Rivera, and Eduardo Rivera v. Al Green, Karen Green, Mitchell Simmons, Carl W. Johnson and Maricopa County Sheriff's Dept.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Hun v. Center PropertiesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Atchison v. Great Western Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API