Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Wood

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1986No. 18397-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

We granted this Petition for Review to determine whether a suit for personal injuries is barred by the statute of limitations or whether the statute of limitations was tolled until the defendant became a resident of Arizona. The trial court ruled that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations, and the court of appeals agreed. Monroe v. Wood, 150 Ariz. 419, 724 P.2d 38 (App.1985). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Const. art. 6 § 5(3), and Rule 23, Ariz. R. Civ. App. P., 17A A.R.S.

The facts of the case are undisputed. On July 24, 1974, Irene O. Holland…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In Re Goldsworthy's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brandler v. Manuel Trevizo Hay Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. DeLoach v. AlfredCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Western Group Nurseries, Inc. v. Estate of Adams (In Re Western United Nurseries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1996
  4. Derwin Sims, Sr. v. John HauserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API