Legal Opinion

Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Hilvert

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1945No. Civil No. 4714PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaPRADE, J.

This action comes to this court on appeal for the second time. For a full statement of the facts, reference is made to our former opinion. See Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Hilvert, 60 Ariz. 537, 142 Pac. (2d) 411. The action was instituted by appellant for the purpose of securing judgment against appellee upon three promissory- notes, two of which were dated at Cincinnati, Ohio, and made payable at St. Louis, Mo. The third note was dated at St. Louis, Mo., and made payable at St. Louis. The notes became due in January, 1934, and this action was commenced in September, 1941. Anticipating a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Huss v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Smith v. NormartArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fisher v. Phelps, Dodge & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Donald Emery Major v. Arizona State Prison, John Moran, H. J. Cardwell, Capt. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Sacchi v. BlodigNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Van Cleef v. Aeroflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Selby v. KarmanArizona Supreme Court · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API