Legal Opinion

Markham v. Fralick

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1934No. L. A. 14551PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action is one in unlawful detainer. The property in controversy was under a ninety-nine year lease. The lessees, the defendants and respondents in this action, were in default in the payment of some $30,000 rent besides taxes which they had agreed to pay. The leased premises were a city block in Hollywood on which were located some fifteen dwellings or bungalows occupied by ten or twelve subtenants. The defendants were in possession of the property only through their subtenants. Their agent collected the rents and paid, them to his principals, the defendants. While the defendants were in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Telegraph Avenue Corp. v. RaentschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Chase v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Tujague v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Union Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Roy K. Hifai, Dba Roy's Sunnyvale Shell v. Shell Oil Co., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Vasey v. California Dance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Mihans v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API