Legal Opinion

Mihans v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1970No. Civ. 27931PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

In this proceeding in which we issued an alternative writ of prohibition, petitioners challenge the constitutionality of Code of Civil Procedure section 1166a, 1 insofar as it authorizes the issuance of a prejudgment writ of immediate possession pending the hearing on the merits in an unlawful detainer action. They contend that such procedure deprives them of property without due process of law and denies them the equal protection of the law.

Petitioners are tenants in possession of certain premises in Berkeley pursuant to oral month-to-month tenancies. On February 6,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API