Legal Opinion

Telegraph Avenue Corp. v. Raentsch

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12819PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petition of appellant for hearing by this court after decision by the district court of appeal, first appellate district, division two, was granted because of the importance and novelty of the questions involved upon the appeal and to enable this court to make a further study of the points so earnestly argued in the briefs. Upon careful consideration, we are satisfied with the solution of these matters in the opinion heretofore filed herein by the district court of appeal, Nourse, J., and adopted said opinion as and for the opinion of this court, as follows:

“Plaintiff sued in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Veysey v. MoriyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Palmtag v. DoutrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lang v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Tujague v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Markham v. FralickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Mihans v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Petroleum Collections Inc. v. SwordsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API