Legal Opinion
Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Hall
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 5, 1984No. 83SC2PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals opinion in Hall v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., 660 P.2d 1298 (Colo.App.1982), which held that the plaintiff, Cathy Hall, is entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) benefits from the defendant, Trinity Universal Insurance Co. (Trinity). We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
In 1978 the plaintiff was buying refreshments from a truck used as a refreshment stand when a collapsible side awning permanently attached to the truck fell and struck her head. At the time of the injury the truck was stationary,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Azar v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.