Smeade v. Rosen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to rescind a contract for the sale of real estate entered into with defendant Robert R. Fraser, and for damages in the event that the property conveyed by virtue of said contract could not be reconveyed to her. She-alleged that the conveyance of said property was secured from her by the fraud of the defendants, all of whom had entered into a conspiracy to defraud, her of said property. Defendants Louis Rosen and Ida Rosen answered denying the allegations of fraud and conspiracy. Upon the trial of said cause judgment was rendered in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horvath v. National Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Shirey v. All Night and Day BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Conklin v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hicks v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sarten v. PomattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers v. Pennsylvania Pipeline, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Smith v. KeatingWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Lange v. CurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Crumlish v. PriceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.