Legal Opinion

Sarten v. Pomatto

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1961No. Civ. 6515PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

This is an appeal from a single judgment in two consolidated actions: (1) the first being upon a common count for money had and received, hereinafter referred to as the common count action; and, (2) the second seeking equitable relief from a default judgment on the ground of fraud and mistake, hereinafter referred to as the equitable action.

Common Count Action

This is an action to recover $10,000 paid as a deposit in connection with the proposed sale of a motel; a trial was had upon the issues presented as between the plaintiff and respondent, Archie Sartén, and the defendants and appellants,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Barker v. HullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Groves v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Rohrbasser v. LedererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Skouland v. SkoulandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API