Legal Opinion

Lange v. Curtin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1936No. Civ. 9990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs sued to rescind a promissory note and deed of trust and had judgment. The two corporate defendants alone appeal, but, since the Federal Finance Company is the real party in interest pressing the appeal, we will refer to it herein as the appellant.

On February 25, 1931, plaintiffs executed and delivered to defendant Curtin a promissory note in the sum of $12,000 secured by a deed of trust covering real property located in Glendora, Los Angeles County. After the deed was recorded a mistake was discovered in the description of the property and Curtin procured a forged deed covering the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Shirey v. All Night and Day BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Conklin v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers Union Oil Co. of Dickinson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Monarch Lumber Co. v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Medak v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Ghiglione v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Williams v. National Western Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API