Truskey v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
In this workmen’s compensation appeal, the claimant1 attacks the board’s2 reversal of the referee’s conclusion that employer’s3 contest was unreasonable, and the board’s deletion of the additional award of attorney’s fees under Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).4
The employer submits it acted reasonably in pursuing the defense that claimant did not properly notify it of the alleged injury within the 120 days required by Section 311 of the Act, as amended, 77 P.S. §631.
Although the question of reasonable contest includes factual inquiries, it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Murray v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Paris Neckwear Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Moyer v. EdingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Auto Service Councils of Pa., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Borough of Norwood v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988