Legal Opinion

Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 760 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

In this workmen’s compensation case, Mabel Ball (claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed a referee’s award of attorney’s fees and failed to award penalties to the claimant.

On September 29, 1972, claimant’s husband, John Ball, an employee of Universal Cyclops Steel Corporation (employer), suffered fatal injuries when he fell to the floor on the employer’s premises while in the course of *159his employment. Claimant filed a fatal claim petition under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 and was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Sherred v. PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Hartman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Ratchko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Cleaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API