Legal Opinion
Moyer v. Edinger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
The petition of appellant for compensation was dismissed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the reason that the notice required by the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, art. III, §§311-312, as amended (77 P.S. §§631-632), had not been given to the appellee (employer) within the period prescribed by the statute. The action of the Board was sustained by the court below and this appeal followed.
The claimant alleges that he sustained an injury to his back on November 13, 1957, when, as an employee of defendant, he slipped on a loose stone while handling a piece of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allen v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Potter v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Uditsky v. KrakovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Paris Neckwear Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Truskey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hargrave v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961