Murray v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compersation Act1 provides that reasonable attorney’s fees shall be awarded to a claimant who prevails on a contested claim unless the record discloses a reasonable basis for the employer’s or insurer’s contest.
This case is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which deleted a referee’s award of attorney’s fees while affirming his decision in favor of the claimant in all other particulars. The deletion of attorney’s fees is the sole issue presented.
*5The record clearly establishes that claimant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crangi Distributing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Ratchko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Jodon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Arena v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Glagola v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gunther v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.