Legal Opinion

Murray v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1259 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compersation Act1 provides that reasonable attorney’s fees shall be awarded to a claimant who prevails on a contested claim unless the record discloses a reasonable basis for the employer’s or insurer’s contest.

This case is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which deleted a referee’s award of attorney’s fees while affirming his decision in favor of the claimant in all other particulars. The deletion of attorney’s fees is the sole issue presented.

*5The record clearly establishes that claimant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crangi Distributing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Ratchko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Jodon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Arena v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Glagola v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Gunther v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API