Legal Opinion
United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. Kramarsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 1978No. 77 Civ. 1979(MP)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging that undisputed facts are dispositive of this suit.
The plaintiff, United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund (hereafter Fund) sues defendant Werner Kramarsky in his capacity as the Commissioner of the New York Human Rights Division (hereafter Division) for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent Kramarsky from compelling the Fund to provide New York City school personnel with disability benefits related to pregnancies. The plaintiff relies on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Electrical Workers, Local No. 1 Credit Union v. IBEW-NECA Holiday Trust FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Hashemi v. ShackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Solar Kinetics Corp. v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Morgan Consultants v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.