Legal Opinion
Solar Kinetics Corp. v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 17, 1980No. Civ. H-76-417PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON COUNTERCLAIM
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
This case arose out of a contract dispute between Solar Kinetics Corporation (“Solar Kinetics”) and Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“Ryerson”) over alleged nonconformities in aluminum sold to Solar Kinetics by Ryerson. After a jury trial Solar Kinetics was awarded $69,343 in damages for its breach-of-contract claims. This ruling now resolves the issues raised in the counterclaim filed by Ryerson, which seeks a judgment for the outstanding balance due on the purchase price.
As its name suggests, Solar Kinetics was a company formed to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. Hayden Harper, Jr. v. Tri-County Ford Tractor Sales, Inc., and Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Barry & Sewall Industrial Supply Co., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Metal-Prep of Houston, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Dasler v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Sherkate Sahami Khass Rapol v. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.